On the maximum number of Latin transversals

Abstract

Let T(n) denote the maximal number of transversals in an order-n Latin square. Improving on the bounds obtained by McKay et al., Taranenko recently proved that T(n) ≤ ((1+o(1))ne2)n, and conjectured that this bound is tight. We prove via a probabilistic construction that indeed T(n) = ((1+o(1))ne2)n. Until the present paper, no superexponential lower bound for T(n) was known. We also give a simpler proof of the upper bound.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…