p-capacity vs surface-area
Abstract
This paper is devoted to exploring the relationship between the [1,n) p-capacity and the surface-area in Rn 2 which especially shows: if ⊂ Rn is a convex, compact, smooth set with its interior = and the mean curvature H(∂,·)>0 of its boundary ∂ then (n(p-1)p(n-1))p-1(capp()(p-1n-p)1-pσn-1)(area(∂)σn-1)n-pn-1([n-1]∫∂(H(∂,·))n-1dσ(·)σn-1)p-1∀ p∈ (1,n) whose limits 1← p\ \&\ p→ n imply 1=cap1()area(∂)\ \ \& \ ∫∂(H(∂,·))n-1dσ(·)σn-1 1, thereby not only discovering that the new best known constant is roughly half as far from the one conjectured by P\'olya-Szeg\"o in [(2)]P but also extending the P\'olya-Szeg\"o inequality in [(5)]P, with both the conjecture and the inequality being stated for the electrostatic capacity of a convex solid in R3.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.