Approximate Hypergraph Coloring under Low-discrepancy and Related Promises
Abstract
A hypergraph is said to be -colorable if its vertices can be colored with colors so that no hyperedge is monochromatic. 2-colorability is a fundamental property (called Property B) of hypergraphs and is extensively studied in combinatorics. Algorithmically, however, given a 2-colorable k-uniform hypergraph, it is NP-hard to find a 2-coloring miscoloring fewer than a fraction 2-k+1 of hyperedges (which is achieved by a random 2-coloring), and the best algorithms to color the hypergraph properly require ≈ n1-1/k colors, approaching the trivial bound of n as k increases. In this work, we study the complexity of approximate hypergraph coloring, for both the maximization (finding a 2-coloring with fewest miscolored edges) and minimization (finding a proper coloring using fewest number of colors) versions, when the input hypergraph is promised to have the following stronger properties than 2-colorability: (A) Low-discrepancy: If the hypergraph has discrepancy k, we give an algorithm to color the it with ≈ nO(2/k) colors. However, for the maximization version, we prove NP-hardness of finding a 2-coloring miscoloring a smaller than 2-O(k) (resp. k-O(k)) fraction of the hyperedges when = O( k) (resp. =2). Assuming the UGC, we improve the latter hardness factor to 2-O(k) for almost discrepancy-1 hypergraphs. (B) Rainbow colorability: If the hypergraph has a (k-)-coloring such that each hyperedge is polychromatic with all these colors, we give a 2-coloring algorithm that miscolors at most k-(k) of the hyperedges when k, and complement this with a matching UG hardness result showing that when =k, it is hard to even beat the 2-k+1 bound achieved by a random coloring.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.