Shelah's eventual categoricity conjecture in universal classes: part I
Abstract
We prove: Theorem Let K be a universal class. If K is categorical in cardinals of arbitrarily high cofinality, then K is categorical on a tail of cardinals. The proof stems from ideas of Adi Jarden and Will Boney, and also relies on a deep result of Shelah. As opposed to previous works, the argument is in ZFC and does not use the assumption of categoricity in a successor cardinal. The argument generalizes to abstract elementary classes (AECs) that satisfy a locality property and where certain prime models exist. Moreover assuming amalgamation we can give an explicit bound on the Hanf number and get rid of the cofinality restrictions: Theorem Let K be an AEC with amalgamation. Assume that K is fully LS (K)-tame and short and has primes over sets of the form M \a\. Write H2 := (2(2LS (K))+)+. If K is categorical in a λ > H2, then K is categorical in all λ' H2.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.