Coercive functions from a topological viewpoint and properties of minimizing sets of convex functions appearing in image restoration
Abstract
Many tasks in image processing can be tackled by modeling an appropriate data fidelity term : Rn → R \+∞\ and then solve one of the regularized minimization problems align* &(P1,τ) argminx ∈ Rn \ (x) \; s.t.\; (x) ≤ τ \ \\ &(P2,λ) argminx ∈ Rn \ (x) + λ (x) \, \; λ > 0 align* with some function : Rn → R \+∞\ and a good choice of the parameter(s). Two tasks arise naturally here: align* & 1. Study the solver sets SOL(P1,τ) and SOL(P2,λ) of the minimization problems. \\ & 2. Ensure that the minimization problems have solutions. align* This thesis provides contributions to both tasks: Regarding the first task for a more special setting we prove that there are intervals (0,c) and (0,d) such that the setvalued curves align* τ & SOL(P1,τ), \; τ ∈ (0,c) \\ λ & SOL(P2,λ), \; λ ∈ (0,d) align* are the same, besides an order reversing parameter change g: (0,c) → (0,d). Moreover we show that the solver sets are changing all the time while τ runs from 0 to c and λ runs from d to 0. In the presence of lower semicontinuity the second task is done if we have additionally coercivity. We regard lower semicontinuity and coercivity from a topological point of view and develop a new technique for proving lower semicontinuity plus coercivity. Dropping any lower semicontinuity assumption we also prove a theorem on the coercivity of a sum of functions.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.