Interior Nucleation of Martensite in a Cubic-to-Tetragonal Phase Transformation
Abstract
Using a variational model based on non-linear elasticity we investigate whether in a cubic-to-tetragonal phase transformation it is energetically preferable to nucleate martensite within austenite. Under minimal growth assumptions on the free energy density W away from the wells, we derive explicit upper bounds on Wqc(I), i.e. on the macroscopic free energy density of a region that has been macroscopically deformed by the identity map. The bounds only depend on material parameters, the temperature difference and the growth of W away from the wells. By comparing Wqc(I) and W(I) we conclude that nucleation is always energetically preferable and are able to provide quantitative upper bounds for the gain in negative energy due to nucleation.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.