Avoiding vincular patterns on alternating words

Abstract

A word w=w1w2·s wn is alternating if either w1<w2>w3<w4>·s (when the word is up-down) or w1>w2<w3>w4<·s (when the word is down-up). The study of alternating words avoiding classical permutation patterns was initiated by the authors in~GKZ, where, in particular, it was shown that 123-avoiding up-down words of even length are counted by the Narayana numbers. However, not much was understood on the structure of 123-avoiding up-down words. In this paper, we fill in this gap by introducing the notion of a cut-pair that allows us to subdivide the set of words in question into equivalence classes. We provide a combinatorial argument to show that the number of equivalence classes is given by the Catalan numbers, which induces an alternative (combinatorial) proof of the corresponding result in~GKZ. Further, we extend the enumerative results in~GKZ to the case of alternating words avoiding a vincular pattern of length 3. We show that it is sufficient to enumerate up-down words of even length avoiding the consecutive pattern 132 and up-down words of odd length avoiding the consecutive pattern 312 to answer all of our enumerative questions. The former of the two key cases is enumerated by the Stirling numbers of the second kind.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…