On the Index of a Non-Fredholm Model Operator
Abstract
Let \A(t)\t ∈ R be a path of self-adjoint Fredholm operators in a Hilbert space H, joining endpoints A as t ∞. Computing the index of the operator DA= (d/d t) + A acting in L2(R; H), where A = ∫R dt \, A(t), and its relation to spectral flow along this path, has a long history. While most of the latter focuses on the case where A(t) all have purely discrete spectrum, we now particularly study situations permitting essential spectra. Introducing H1=DA* DA and H2=DA DA*, we consider spectral shift functions (\, · \,; A+, A-) and (\, · \, ; H2, H1) associated with the pairs (A+, A-) and (H2,H1). Assuming A+ to be a relatively trace class perturbation of A- and A to be Fredholm, the value (0; A-, A+) was shown in [14] to represent the spectral flow along the path \A(t)\t∈ R while that of (0+; H1,H2) yields the Fredholm index of DA. The fact, proved in [14], that these values of the two spectral functions are equal, resolves the index = spectral flow question in this case. When the path \A(t)\t ∈ R consists of differential operators, the relatively trace class perturbation assumption is violated. The simplest assumption that applies (to differential operators in (1+1)-dimensions) is a relatively Hilbert-Schmidt perturbation. This is not just an incremental improvement. In fact, the approximation method we employ here to make this extension is of interest in any dimension. Moreover we consider A which are not necessarily Fredholm and we establish that the relationships between the two spectral shift functions for the pairs (A+, A-) and (H2,H1) found in all of the previous papers [9], [14], and [22] can be proved in the non-Fredholm case.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.