Direct Shear Mapping: Prospects for weak lensing studies of individual galaxy-galaxy lensing systems

Abstract

We have investigated, using both a theoretical and an empirical approach, the frequency of low redshift galaxy-galaxy lensing systems in which the signature of weak lensing might be directly detectable. We find good agreement between these two approaches. In order to make a theoretical estimate of the weak lensing shear, γ, for each galaxy in a catalogue, we have made an estimate of the asymptotic circular velocity from the stellar mass using three different approaches: from a simulation based relation, from an empirically-derived relation, and using the baryonic Tully-Fisher relation. Using data from the Galaxy and Mass Assembly redshift survey we estimate the frequency of detectable weak lensing at low redshift. We find that to a redshift of z 0.6, the probability of a galaxy being weakly lensed by at least γ = 0.02 is 0.01. A scatter in the M*-Mh relation results in a shift towards higher measured shears for a given population of galaxies. Given this, and the good probability of weak lensing at low redshifts, we have investigated the feasibility of measuring the scatter in the M*-Mh relation using shear statistics. This is a novel measurement, and is made possible because DSM is able to make individual direct~ shear measurements, in contrast to traditional weak lensing techniques which can only make statistical measurements. We estimate that for a shear measurement error of γ = 0.02 (consistent with the sensitivity of DSM), a sample of 50,000 spatially and spectrally resolved galaxies would allow a measurement of the scatter in the M*-Mh relation to be made. While there are no currently existing IFU surveys of this size, there are upcoming surveys which will provide this data (e.g The Hobby-Eberly Telescope Dark Energy Experiment (HETDEX), surveys with Hector, and the Square Kilometre Array (SKA)).

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…