Phenomenological analysis of near threshold periodic modulations of the proton timelike form factor

Abstract

We have recently highlighted the presence of a periodically oscillating 10 \% modulation in the BABAR data on the proton timelike form factors, in the reaction e++e- → p+p. Here we deepen our previous data analysis, and confirm that in the case of several standard parametrizations it is possible to write the form factor in the form F0 + Fosc, where F0 is a parametrization expressing the long-range trend of the form factor (for q2 ranging from the pp threshold to 36 GeV2), and Fosc is a function of the form (-Bp)(Cp), where p is the relative momentum of the final pp pair. Error bars allow for a clean identification of the main features of this modulation for q2 < 10 GeV2. Assuming this oscillatory modulation to be an effect of final state interactions between the forming proton and the antiproton, we propose a phenomenological model based on a double-layer imaginary optical potential. This potential is flux-absorbing when the distance between the proton and antiproton centers of mass is 1.7-1.8 fm and flux-generating when it is 1.7-1.8 fm. The main features of the oscillations may be reproduced with some freedom in the potential parameters, but the transition between the two layers must be sudden (0-0.2 fm) to get the correct oscillation period. The flux-absorbing part of the pp interaction is due to the annihilation of pp pairs into multi-meson states. We interpret the flux-creating part of the potential as due to the creation of a 1/q-ranged state when the virtual photon decays into a set of current quarks and antiquarks, including heavy ones, that may exist for a short time. The decay of these large mass states leads to an intermediate stage regeneration of the pp channel.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…