Is there a computable upper bound on the heights of rational solutions of a Diophantine equation with a finite number of solutions?

Abstract

The height of a rational number p/q is denoted by h(p/q) and equals max(|p|,|q|) provided p/q is written in lowest terms. The height of a rational tuple (x1,...,xn) is denoted by h(x1,...,xn) and equals max(h(x1),...,h(xn)). Let Gn=xi+1=xk: i,k ∈ 1,...,n xi · xj=xk: i,j,k ∈ 1,...,n. Let f(1)=1, and let f(n+1)=2(2(f(n))) for every positive integer n. We conjecture: (1) if a system S ⊂eq Gn has only finitely many solutions in rationals x1,...,xn, then each such solution (x1,...,xn) satisfies h(x1,...,xn) ≤ 1 (if n=1), 2(2(n-2)) (if n>1); (2) if a system S ⊂eq Gn has only finitely many solutions in non-negative rationals x1,...,xn, then each such solution (x1,...,xn) satisfies h(x1,...,xn) ≤ f(2n). We prove: (1) both conjectures imply that there exists an algorithm which takes as input a Diophantine equation, returns an integer, and this integer is greater than the heights of rational solutions, if the solution set is finite; (2) both conjectures imply that the question whether or not a given Diophantine equation has only finitely many rational solutions is decidable by a single query to an oracle that decides whether or not a given Diophantine equation has a rational solution.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…