Stellar Mass to Halo Mass Scaling Relation for X-ray Selected Low Mass Galaxy Clusters and Groups out to Redshift z≈1
Abstract
We present the stellar mass-halo mass scaling relation for 46 X-ray selected low-mass clusters or groups detected in the XMM-BCS survey with masses 2×1013M M5002.5×1014M at redshift 0.1 z 1.02. The cluster binding masses M500 are inferred from the measured X-ray luminosities , while the stellar masses M of the galaxy populations are estimated using near-infrared imaging from the SSDF survey and optical imaging from the BCS survey. With the measured \ and stellar mass M, we determine the best fit stellar mass-halo mass relation, accounting for selection effects, measurement uncertainties and the intrinsic scatter in the scaling relation. The resulting mass trend is M M5000.690.15, the intrinsic (log-normal) scatter is σ M|M500=0.36+0.07-0.06, and there is no significant redshift trend M (1+z)-0.040.47, although the uncertainties are still large. We also examine M within a fixed projected radius of 0.5~Mpc, showing that it provides a cluster binding mass proxy with intrinsic scatter of ≈93\% (1σ in M500). We compare our M=M(M500, z) scaling relation from the XMM-BCS clusters with samples of massive, SZE-selected clusters (M500≈6×1014M) and low mass NIR-selected clusters (M500≈1014M) at redshift 0.6 z 1.3. After correcting for the known mass measurement systematics in the compared samples, we find that the scaling relation is in good agreement with the high redshift samples, suggesting that for both groups and clusters the stellar content of the galaxy populations within R500 depends strongly on mass but only weakly on redshift out to z≈1.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.