An Elementary Approach to Containment Relations Between Symbolic and Ordinary Powers of Certain Monomial Ideals

Abstract

The purpose of this note is to find an elemenary explanation of a surprising result of Ein--Lazarsfeld--Smith ELS and Hochster--Huneke HH on the containment between symbolic and ordinary powers of ideals in simple cases. This line of research has been very active ever since, see for instance BC,HaH,DST and the references therein, by now the literature on this topic is quite extensive. By `elementary' we refer to arguments that among others do not make use of resolution of singularities and multiplier ideals nor tight closure methods. Let us quickly recall the statement ELS: let X be a smooth projective variety of dimension n, S ⊂eq OX a non-zero sheaf of radical ideals with zero scheme Z⊂eq X; if every irreducible component of Z has codimension at least e, then \[ S(me)Z ⊂eq SmZ \] for all m≥ 1. Our goal is to reprove this assertion in the case of points in projective spaces (as asked in PAGII*Example 11.3.5) without recurring to deep methods of algebraic geometry. Instead of working with subsets of projective space, we will concentrate on the affine cones over them; our aim hence becomes to understand symbolic and ordinary powers ideals of sets of line through the origin. We will end up reducing the general case to a study of the ideals \[ I2,n =(xixj 1≤ i<j≤ n) ⊂eq k[x1,…,xn] \] defining the union of coordinate axes in nk. We work over an arbitrary field k. Our main result is as follows. Let ⊂eq Pn-1 be a set of n points not lying in a hyperplane. Then \[ S( (2-2n)m ) ⊂eq Sm \] for all positive integers m. If n=3, then the same statement holds for three distinct points in arbitrary position.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…