A potential theoretic minimax problem on the torus
Abstract
We investigate an extension of an equilibrium-type result, conjectured by Ambrus, Ball and Erd\'elyi, and proved recently by Hardin, Kendall and Saff. These results were formulated on the torus, hence we also work on the torus, but one of the main motivations for our extension comes from an analogous setup on the unit interval, investigated earlier by Fenton. Basically, the problem is a minimax one, i.e. to minimize the maximum of a function F, defined as the sum of arbitrary translates of certain fixed "kernel functions", minimization understood with respect to the translates. If these kernels are assumed to be concave, having certain singularities or cusps at zero, then translates by yj will have singularities at yj (while in between these nodes the sum function still behaves realtively regularly). So one can consider the maxima mi on each subintervals between the nodes yj, and look for the minimization of F = i mi. Here also a dual question of maximization of i mi arises. This type of minimax problems were treated under some additional assumptions on the kernels. Also the problem is normalized so that y0=0. In particular, Hardin, Kendall and Saff assumed that we have one single kernel K on the torus or circle, and F=Σj=0n K(·-yj)= K + Σj=1n K(·-yj). Fenton considered situations on the interval with two fixed kernels J and K, also satisfying additional assumptions, and F= J + Σj=1n K(·-yj). Here we consider the situation (on the circle) when all the kernel functions can be different, and F=Σj=0n Kj(·- yj) = K0 + Σj=1n Kj(·-yj). Also an emphasis is put on relaxing all other technical assumptions and give alternative, rather minimal variants of the set of conditions on the kernel.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.