Compactness of the quantifier on "Complete Embedding of BA's"
Abstract
We try to build, provably in ZFC, for a first order T a model in which any isomorphism between two Boolean algebras is definable. The problem, compared to [Sh:384], is with pseudo-finite Boolean algebras. A side benefit is that we do not use Skolem function (which do not matter for proving compactness of logics but still are of interest). Let lambda be 2mu if regular and its successor otherwise. Model theoretically we investigate notions of bigness of types, usually those are ideals of the set of formulas in a model, definable in appropriate sense. We build a model of cardinality lambdaplus by a sequence of models Malpha of cardinality lambda for alpha less than lambdaplus, each Malpha equips with a sequence (Malpha, i, aalpha, i, Omegaalpha, i) : i in SI subseteq lambda, with Malpha, i is of cardinality less than lambda, precedes-increasing continuous with i, Omegaalpha, i a bigness notion defined using parameters from Malpha, i and aalpha, i realized in Malpha, i plus 1 over Malpha,i a Omegaalpha, i-big type. As alpha increase, not only Malpha increase, but this extra structure increasing modulo a club of lambda, this is why we have insisted on lambda being regular. This can be considered as a way to omit types of cardinality lambda, which in general is hard. The fact that lambda is not too much larger than mu helps us to guarantee that any possible automorphism of structures be defined in M equals union bracket Malpha: alpha less than lambdaplus bracket by approximations of cardinal mu and so we can enumerate them all.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.