Source-Channel Secrecy for Shannon Cipher System

Abstract

Recently, a secrecy measure based on list-reconstruction has been proposed [2], in which a wiretapper is allowed to produce a list of 2mRL reconstruction sequences and the secrecy is measured by the minimum distortion over the entire list. In this paper, we show that this list secrecy problem is equivalent to the one with secrecy measured by a new quantity lossy-equivocation, which is proven to be the minimum optimistic 1-achievable source coding rate (the minimum coding rate needed to reconstruct the source within target distortion with positive probability for infinitely many blocklengths) of the source with the wiretapped signal as two-sided information, and also can be seen as a lossy extension of conventional equivocation. Upon this (or list) secrecy measure, we study source-channel secrecy problem in the discrete memoryless Shannon cipher system with noisy wiretap channel. Two inner bounds and an outer bound on the achievable region of secret key rate, list rate, wiretapper distortion, and distortion of legitimate user are given. The inner bounds are derived by using uncoded scheme and (operationally) separate scheme, respectively. Thanks to the equivalence between lossy-equivocation secrecy and list secrecy, information spectrum method is leveraged to prove the outer bound. As special cases, the admissible region for the case of degraded wiretap channel or lossless communication for legitimate user has been characterized completely. For both these two cases, separate scheme is proven to be optimal. Interestingly, however, separation indeed suffers performance loss for other certain cases. Besides, we also extend our results to characterize the achievable region for Gaussian communication case. As a side product optimistic lossy source coding has also been addressed.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…