Shelah's eventual categoricity conjecture in universal classes. Part II
Abstract
We prove that a universal class categorical in a high-enough cardinal is categorical on a tail of cardinals. As opposed to other results in the literature, we work in ZFC, do not require the categoricity cardinal to be a successor, do not assume amalgamation, and do not use large cardinals. Moreover we give an explicit bound on the "high-enough" threshold: Theorem Let be a universal Lω1, ω sentence. If is categorical in some λ _ω1, then is categorical in all λ' _ω1. As a byproduct of the proof, we show that a conjecture of Grossberg holds in universal classes: Corollary Let be a universal Lω1, ω sentence that is categorical in some λ _ω1, then the class of models of has the amalgamation property for models of size at least _ω1. We also establish generalizations of these two results to uncountable languages. As part of the argument, we develop machinery to transfer model-theoretic properties between two different classes satisfying a compatibility condition. This is used as a bridge between Shelah's milestone study of universal classes (which we use extensively) and a categoricity transfer theorem of the author for abstract elementary classes that have amalgamation, are tame, and have primes over sets of the form M \a\.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.