On Alternation and the Union Theorem

Abstract

Under the assumption P=2p, we prove a new variant of the Union Theorem of McCreight and Meyer for the class 2p. This yields a union function F which is computable in time F(n)c for some constant c and satisfies P=DTIME(F)=2(F)=2p with respect to a subfamily (Si) of 2-machines. We show that this subfamily does not change the complexity classes P and 2p. Moreover, a padding construction shows that this also implies DTIME(Fc)=2(Fc). On the other hand, we prove a variant of Gupta's result who showed that DTIME(t)⊂neq2(t) for time-constructible functions t(n). Our variant of this result holds with respect to the subfamily (Si) of 2-machines. We show that these two results contradict each other. Hence the assumption P=2p cannot hold.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…