A disconnected deformation space of rational maps
Abstract
Let f:(P1,P)(P1,P) be a postcritically finite rational map with postcritical set P. William Thurston showed that f induces a holomorphic pullback map σf:TPP on the Teichm\"uller space TP:=Teich(P1,P). If f is not a flexible Latt\`es map, Thurston proved that σf has a unique fixed point. In his PhD thesis, Adam Epstein generalized Thurston's ideas and defined a deformation space associated to a rational map f:(P1,A) (P1,B) where A ⊂eq B, allowing for maps f which are not necessarily postcritically finite. By definition, the deformation space DefBA(f)⊂eq TB is the locus where the pullback map σf:TBA and the forgetful map σAB:TBA agree. Using purely local arguments, Epstein showed that DefBA(f) is a smooth analytic submanifold of TB of dimension |B-A|. In this article, we investigate the question of whether DefBA(f) is connected. We exhibit a family of quadratic rational maps for which the associated deformation spaces are disconnected; in fact, each has infinitely many components.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.