Improving on the Cut-Set Bound via Geometric Analysis of Typical Sets

Abstract

We consider the discrete memoryless symmetric primitive relay channel, where, a source X wants to send information to a destination Y with the help of a relay Z and the relay can communicate to the destination via an error-free digital link of rate R0, while Y and Z are conditionally independent and identically distributed given X. We develop two new upper bounds on the capacity of this channel that are tighter than existing bounds, including the celebrated cut-set bound. Our approach significantly deviates from the standard information-theoretic approach for proving upper bounds on the capacity of multi-user channels. We build on the blowing-up lemma to analyze the probabilistic geometric relations between the typical sets of the n-letter random variables associated with a reliable code for communicating over this channel. These relations translate to new entropy inequalities between the n-letter random variables involved. As an application of our bounds, we study an open question posed by (Cover, 1987), namely, what is the minimum needed Z-Y link rate R0* in order for the capacity of the relay channel to be equal to that of the broadcast cut. We consider the special case when the X-Y and X-Z links are both binary symmetric channels. Our tighter bounds on the capacity of the relay channel immediately translate to tighter lower bounds for R0*. More interestingly, we show that when p 1/2, R0*≥ 0.1803; even though the broadcast channel becomes completely noisy as p 1/2 and its capacity, and therefore the capacity of the relay channel, goes to zero, a strictly positive rate R0 is required for the relay channel capacity to be equal to the broadcast bound.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…