On 132-representable Graphs

Abstract

A graph G = (V,E) is word-representable if there exists a word w over the alphabet V such that letters x and y alternate in w if and only if xy is an edge in E. Word-representable graphs are the subject of a long research line in the literature initiated in KP, and they are the main focus in the recently published book KL. A word w=w1·s wn avoids the pattern 132 if there are no 1≤ i1<i2<i3≤ n such that wi1<wi3<wi2. The theory of patterns in words and permutations is a fast growing area discussed in HM,Kit. A research direction suggested in KL is in merging the theories of word-representable graphs and patterns in words. Namely, given a class of pattern-avoiding words, can we describe the class of graphs represented by the words? Our paper provides the first non-trivial results in this direction. We say that a graph is 132-representable if it can be represented by a 132-avoiding word. We show that each 132-representable graph is necessarily a circle graph. Also, we show that any tree and any cycle graph are 132-representable, which is a rather surprising fact taking into account that most of these graphs are non-representable in the sense specified, as a generalization of the notion of a word-representable graph, in JKPR. Finally, we provide explicit 132-avoiding representations for all graphs on at most five vertices, and also describe all such representations, and enumerate them, for complete graphs.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…