Some new categorical invariants

Abstract

We introduce several notions and give examples. We prove that Stab(Db(K(l))) C× H for l≥ 3, where K(l) is l-Kronecker quiver. This is an example of SOD, where Stab( T1, T2 ) Stab( T1)× Stab( T2). This example suggest a new notion of a norm, strictly increasing on \Db(K(l))\l≥ 2. To a triangulated category T which has property of a phase gap we attach a non-negative number T . Natural assumptions on a SOD imply T1, T2 ≥ max\ T1 , T2 \. Using this we define a topology on the set of equivalence classes of triangulated categories with a phase gap, where the set of discrete derived categories is a discrete subset and the rationality of a smooth surface S ensures that [Db(point)] ∈ Cl([Db(S)]). Viewing Db(K(l)) as a non-commutative curve, we observe that it is reasonable to count non-commutative curves in any category in a small neighborhood of Db(K(l)). Examples show that this idea (non-commutative curve-counting) opens directions to new categorical structures and connections to number theory and classical geometry. We give a definition, which specializes to the non-commutative curve-counting invariants. In an example arising on the A side we specialize our definition to non-commutative Calabi-Yau curve-counting, where the entities we count are a Calabi-Yau modification of Db(K(l)). Finally we speculate that one might consider a holomorphic family of categories, introduced by Kontsevich, as a non-commutative extension with the norm playing a role similar to the classical notion of degree of an extension in Galois theory.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…