Rich square-free words

Abstract

A word w is rich if it has |w|+1 many distinct palindromic factors, including the empty word. A word is square-free if it does not have a factor uu, where u is a non-empty word. Pelantov\'a and Starosta (Discrete Math. 313 (2013)) proved that every infinite rich word contains a square. We will give another proof for that result. Pelantov\'a and Starosta denoted by r(n) the length of a longest rich square-free word on an alphabet of size n. The exact value of r(n) was left as an open question. We will give an upper and a lower bound for r(n), and make a conjecture that our lower bound is exact. We will also generalize the notion of repetition threshold for a limited class of infinite words. The repetition thresholds for episturmian and rich words are left as an open question.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…