Inequality on t(K) defined by Livingston and Naik and its applications

Abstract

Let D+(K,t) denote the positive t-twisted double of K. For a fixed integer-valued additive concordance invariant that bounds the smooth four genus of a knot and determines the smooth four genus of positive torus knots, Livingston and Naik defined t(K) to be the greatest integer t such that (D+(K,t)) = 1. Let K1 and K2 be any knots then we prove the following inequality : t(K1) + t(K2) ≤ t(K1 \# K2) ≤ min(t(K1) - t(-K2), t(K2) - t(-K1)). As an application we show that tτ(K) ≠ ts(K) for infinitely many knots and that their difference can be arbitrarily large, where tτ(K) (respectively ts(K)) is t(K) when is Ozv\'ath-Szab\'o invariant τ (respectively when is normalized Rasmussen s invariant).

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…