Explicit Non-Malleable Extractors, Multi-Source Extractors and Almost Optimal Privacy Amplification Protocols

Abstract

We make progress in the following three problems: 1. Constructing optimal seeded non-malleable extractors; 2. Constructing optimal privacy amplification protocols with an active adversary, for any security parameter; 3. Constructing extractors for independent weak random sources, when the min-entropy is extremely small (i.e., near logarithmic). For the first two problems, the best known non-malleable extractors by Chattopadhyay, Goyal and Li [CGL16], and by Cohen [Coh16a,Coh16b] all require seed length and min-entropy at least 2 (1/ε), where ε is the error of the extractor. As a result, the best known explicit privacy amplification protocols with an active adversary, which achieve 2 rounds of communication and optimal entropy loss in [Li15c,CGL16], can only handle security parameter up to s=(k), where k is the min-entropy of the shared secret weak random source. For larger s the best known protocol with optimal entropy loss in [Li15c] requires O(s/k) rounds of communication. In this paper we give an explicit non-malleable extractor that only requires seed length and min-entropy 1+o(1) (n/ε), which also yields a 2-round privacy amplification protocol with optimal entropy loss for security parameter up to s=k1-α for any constant α>0. For the third problem, previously the best known extractor which supports the smallest min-entropy due to Li [Li13a], requires min-entropy 2+δ n and uses O(1/δ) sources, for any constant δ>0. A very recent result by Cohen and Schulman [CS16] improves this, and constructed explicit extractors that use O(1/δ) sources for min-entropy 1+δ n, any constant δ>0. In this paper we further improve their result, and give an explicit extractor that uses O(1) (an absolute constant) sources for min-entropy 1+o(1) n.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…