Stability for the Complete Intersection Theorem, and the Forbidden Intersection Problem of Erdos and S\'os

Abstract

A family F of sets is said to be t-intersecting if |A B| ≥ t for any A,B ∈ F. The seminal Complete Intersection Theorem of Ahlswede and Khachatrian (1997) gives the maximal size f(n,k,t) of a t-intersecting family of k-element subsets of [n]=\1,2,…,n\, together with a characterisation of the extremal families. The forbidden intersection problem, posed by Erdos and S\'os in 1971, asks for a determination of the maximal size g(n,k,t) of a family F of k-element subsets of [n] such that |A B| ≠ t-1 for any A,B ∈ F. In this paper, we show that for any fixed t ∈ N, if o(n) ≤ k ≤ n/2-o(n), then g(n,k,t)=f(n,k,t). In combination with prior results, this solves the above problem of Erdos and S\'os for any constant t, except for in the ranges n/2-o(n) < k < n/2+t/2 and k < 2t. One key ingredient of the proof is the following sharp `stability' result for the Complete Intersection Theorem: if k/n is bounded away from 0 and 1/2, and F is a t-intersecting family of k-element subsets of [n] such that |F| ≥ f(n,k,t) - O(n-dk), then there exists a family G such that G is extremal for the Complete Intersection Theorem, and |F G| = O(n-dk-d). We believe this result to be of interest in its own right; indeed, it proves a conjecture of Friedgut from 2008. We prove it by combining classical `shifting' arguments with a `bootstrapping' method based upon an isoperimetric inequality. Another key ingredient is a `weak regularity lemma' for families of k-element subsets of [n], where k/n is bounded away from 0 and 1. This states that any such family F is approximately contained within a `junta', such that the restriction of F to each subcube determined by the junta is `pseudorandom' in a certain sense.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…