Scaling laws and flow structures of double diffusive convection in the finger regime

Abstract

Direct numerical simulations are conducted for double diffusive convection (DDC) bounded by two parallel plates, with fluid properties similar to the values of seawater. The DDC flow is driven by an unstable salinity difference and stabilized at the same time by a temperature difference. For these conditions the flow can be in the finger regime. We develop scaling laws for three key response parameters of the system: The non-dimensional salinity flux NuS mainly depends on the salinity Rayleigh number RaS, which measures the strength of the salinity difference, and exhibits a very weak dependence on the density ratio , which is the ratio of the buoyancy forces induced by two scalar differences. The non-dimensional flow velocity Re and the non-dimensional heat flux NuT are dependent on both RaS and . However, the rescaled Reynolds number Reα effu and the rescaled convective heat flux (NuT-1)α effT depend only on RaS. The two exponents are dependent on the fluid properties and are determined from the numerical results. Moreover, the behaviors of NuS and Reα effu agree with the predictions of the Grossmann-Lohse theory which was originally developed for the Rayleigh-B\'enard flow. The non-dimensional salt-finger width and the thickness of the velocity boundary layers, after being rescaled by α effu/2, collapse and obey a similar power-law scaling relation with RaS. When RaS is large enough, salt fingers do not extend from one plate to the other and horizontal zonal flows emerge in the bulk region. We then show that the current scaling strategy can be successfully applied to the experimental results of a heat-copper-ion system~(Hage and Tilgner, Phys. Fluids, 22, 076603, 2010).

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…