Motivic obstruction to rationality of a very general cubic hypersurface in P5

Abstract

Let S be a smooth projective surface over a field. We introduce the notion of integral decomposability and, respectively, the opposite notion of integral indecomposability, of the transcendental motive M2 tr(S). If the transcendental motive is indecomposable rationally, then it is indecomposable integrally. For example, M2 tr(S) is rationally, and hence integrally indecomposable if S is an algebraic K3-surface whose motive is known to be finite-dimensional. In the paper we prove that M2 tr(S) is integrally indecomposable when S is the self-product of a smooth projective curve having enough morphisms onto an elliptic curve with complex multiplication. This applies, for example, when S is the self-product of the Fermat sextic in P2. Some refinement of the same technique yields that M2 tr(S6) is integrally indecomposable, where S6 is the Fermat sextic in P3. This suggests a conjecture saying that the transcendental motive of any smooth projective surface is integrally indecomposable. We prove in the paper that if this motivic integral indecomposability conjecture is true, and if the motive of any smooth projective surface is finite-dimensional, then a very general cubic hypersurface in P5 is not rational.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…