Embeddings of decomposition spaces

Abstract

Many smoothness spaces in harmonic analysis are decomposition spaces. In this paper we ask: Given two decomposition spaces, is there an embedding between the two? A decomposition space D(Q, Lp, Y) can be described using : a covering Q=(Qi)i∈ I of the frequency domain, an exponent p and a sequence space Y⊂CI. Given these, the decomp. space norm of a distribution g is \| g\| D(Q, Lp, Y)=\| (\| F-1(ig)\| Lp)i∈ I\| Y, where (i)i∈ I is a suitable partition of unity for Q. We establish readily verifiable criteria which ensure an embedding D(Q, Lp1, Y)(P, Lp2, Z), mostly concentrating on the case, Y=wq1(I) and Z=vq2(J). The relevant sufficient conditions are p1≤ p2, and finiteness of a norm of the form \[ \| (\| (αi\,βj · vj/wi)i∈ Ij\| t)j∈ J\| s<∞, \] where the \[ Ij=\ i∈ I : Qi Pj≠\ for j∈ J \] are defined in terms of the two coverings Q=(Qi)i∈ I and P=(Pj)j∈ J. We also show that these criteria are sharp: For almost arbitrary coverings and certain ranges of p1,p2, our criteria yield a complete characterization. The same holds for arbitrary values of p1,p2 under more strict assumptions on the coverings. We illustrate the resulting theory by applications to α-modulation and Besov spaces. All known embedding results for these spaces are special cases of our approach; often, we improve considerably upon the state of the art.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…