Gaussian free field light cones and SLE()

Abstract

We derive a surprising correspondence between SLE() processes and light cones of the Gaussian free field (GFF). Recall that (one-sided, chordal, origin-seeded) SLE() processes are in some sense the simplest and most natural variants of the Schramm-Loewner evolution. They were originally defined only for > -2, but one can use L\'evy compensation to extend the definition to any > -2-2 and to obtain qualitatively different curves. The triangle T = \(, ): (-2-2) (2-4) < < -2 \ is the primary focus of this paper. When (, ) ∈ T, the SLE() curves are highly non-simple (and double points are dense) even though < 4. Let h be an instance of the GFF. Fix ∈ (0,4) and = 2/ - /2. Recall that an imaginary geometry ray is a flow line of ei(h/ +θ) that looks locally like SLE. The light cone with parameter θ ∈ [0, π] is the set of points reachable from the origin by a sequence of rays with angles in [-θ/2, θ/2]. When θ=0, the light cone looks like SLE, and when θ = π it looks like the range of an SLE16/. We find that when θ ∈ (0, π) the light cones are either fractal carpets with a dense set of holes or space-filling regions with no holes. We show that every non-space-filling light cone (with θ ∈ (0,π] and ∈ (0,4)) agrees in law with the range of an SLE() process with (, ) ∈ T. Conversely, the range of any SLE() with (,) ∈ T agrees in law with a non-space-filling light cone. As a consequence, we obtain the first proof that these SLE() processes are continuous and show that they are natural path-valued functions of the GFF.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…