A Natural Probabilistic Model on the Integers and its Relation to Dickman-Type Distributions and Buchstab's Function
Abstract
Let \pj\j=1∞ denote the set of prime numbers in increasing order, let N⊂ N denote the set of positive integers with no prime factor larger than pN and let PN denote the probability measure on N which gives to each n∈N a probability proportional to 1n. This measure is in fact the distribution of the random integer IN∈N defined by IN=Πj=1NpjXpj, where \Xpj\j=1∞ are independent random variables and Xpj is distributed as Geom(1-1pj). We show that n N under PN converges weakly to the Dickman distribution. Let Dnat(A) denote the natural density of A⊂N, if it exists, and let Dlog-indep(A)=N∞PN(AN) denote the density of A arising from \PN\N=1∞, if it exists. We show that the two densities coincide on a natural algebra of subsets of N. We also show that they do not agree on the sets of n1s- smooth numbers \ \n∈N: p+(n) n1s\, s>1, where p+(n) is the largest prime divisor of n. This last consideration concerns distributions involving the Dickman function. We also consider the sets of n1s- rough numbers \ \n∈N:p-(n) n1s\, s>1, where p-(n) is the smallest prime divisor of n. We show that the probabilities of these sets, under the uniform distribution on [N]=\1,…, N\ and under the PN-distribution on N, have the same asymptotic decay profile as functions of s, although their rates are necessarily different. This profile involves the Buchstab function. We also prove a new representation for the Buchstab function.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.