Optimal Packings of 22 and 33 Unit Squares in a Square
Abstract
Let s(n) be the side length of the smallest square into which n non-overlapping unit squares can be packed. In 2010, the author showed that s(13)=4 and s(46)=7. Together with the result s(6)=3 by Keaney and Shiu, these results strongly suggest that s(m2-3)=m for m 3, in particular for the values m=5,6, which correspond to cases that lie in between the previous results. In this article we show that indeed s(m2-3)=m for m=5,6, implying that the most efficient packings of 22 and 33 squares are the trivial ones. To achieve our results, we modify the well-known method of sets of unavoidable points by replacing them with continuously varying families of such sets.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.