On generalized hexagons of order (3, t) and (4, t) containing a subhexagon

Abstract

We prove that there are no semi-finite generalized hexagons with q + 1 points on each line containing the known generalized hexagons of order q as full subgeometries when q is equal to 3 or 4, thus contributing to the existence problem of semi-finite generalized polygons posed by Tits. The case when q is equal to 2 was treated by us in an earlier work, for which we give an alternate proof. For the split Cayley hexagon of order 4 we obtain the stronger result that it cannot be contained as a proper full subgeometry in any generalized hexagon.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…