Determination of magic wavelengths for the 7s ~ 2S1/2-7p ~ 2P3/2,1/2 transitions in Fr atom

Abstract

Magic wavelengthsfor the 7S1/2-7P1/2,3/2 transitions in Fr were reported by Dammalapati et al. in [Phys. Rev. A 93, 043407 (2016)]. These λmagic were determined by plotting dynamic polarizabilities (α) of the involved states with the above transitions against a desired range of wavelength. Electric dipole (E1) matrix elements listed in [J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 36, 497 (2007)], from the measured lifetimes of the 7P1/2,3/2 states and from the calculations considering core-polarization effects in the relativistic Hartree-Fock (HFR) method, were used to determine α. However, contributions from core correlation effects and from the E1 matrix elements of the 7P-7S, 7P-8S and 7P-6D transitions to α of the 7P states were ignored. In this work, we demonstrate importance of these contributions and improve accuracies of α further by replacing the E1 matrix elements taken from the HFR method by the values obtained employing relativistic coupled-cluster theory. Our static α are found to be in excellent agreement with the other available theoretical results; whereas substituting the E1 matrix elements used by Dammalapati et al. give very small α values for the 7P states. Owing to this, we find disagreement in λmagic reported by Dammalapati et al. for linearly polarized light; especially at wavelengths close to the D-lines and in the infrared region. As a consequence, a λmagic reported at 797.75 nm which was seen supporting a blue detuned trap in their work is now estimated at 771.03 nm and is supporting a red detuned trap. Also, none of our results match with the earlier results for circularly polarized light. Moreover, our static values of α will be very useful for guiding experiments to carry out their measurements.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…