The (minimum) rank of typical fooling set matrices
Abstract
A fooling-set matrix has nonzero diagonal, but at least one in every pair of diagonally opposite entries is 0. Dietzfelbinger et al. '96 proved that the rank of such a matrix is at least n. It is known that the bound is tight (up to a multiplicative constant). We ask for the "typical" minimum rank of a fooling-set matrix: For a fooling-set zero-nonzero pattern chosen at random, is the minimum rank of a matrix with that zero-nonzero pattern over a field F closer to its lower bound n or to its upper bound n? We study random patterns with a given density p, and prove an (n) bound for the cases when: (a) p tends to 0 quickly enough, (b) p tends to 0 slowly, and | F|=O(1), (c) p∈(0,1] is a constant. We have to leave open the case when p 0 slowly and F is a large or infinite field (e.g., F=GF(2n), F=R).
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.