Efficient Removal Lemmas for Matrices
Abstract
The authors and Fischer recently proved that any hereditary property of two-dimensional matrices (where the row and column order is not ignored) over a finite alphabet is testable with a constant number of queries, by establishing the following (ordered) matrix removal lemma: For any finite alphabet , any hereditary property P of matrices over , and any ε > 0, there exists fP(ε) such that for any matrix M over that is ε-far from satisfying P, most of the fP(ε) × fP(ε) submatrices of M do not satisfy P. Here being ε-far from P means that one needs to modify at least an ε-fraction of the entries of M to make it satisfy P. However, in the above general removal lemma, fP(ε) grows very fast as a function of ε-1, even when P is characterized by a single forbidden submatrix. In this work we establish much more efficient removal lemmas for several special cases of the above problem. In particular, we show the following: For any fixed s × t binary matrix A and any ε > 0 there exists δ > 0 polynomial in ε, such that for any binary matrix M in which less than a δ-fraction of the s × t submatrices are equal to A, there exists a set of less than an ε-fraction of the entries of M that intersects every A-copy in M. We generalize the work of Alon, Fischer and Newman [SICOMP'07] and make progress towards proving one of their conjectures. The proofs combine their efficient conditional regularity lemma for matrices with additional combinatorial and probabilistic ideas.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.