Products of several commutators in a Lie nilpotent associative algebra
Abstract
Let F be a field of characteristic 2,3 and let A be a unital associative F-algebra. Define a left-normed commutator [a1, a2, … , an] (ai ∈ A) recursively by [a1, a2] = a1 a2 - a2 a1, [a1, … , an-1, an] = [[a1, … , an-1], an] (n 3). For n 2, let T(n) (A) be the two-sided ideal in A generated by all commutators [a1, a2, … , an] (ai ∈ A ). Define T(1) (A) = A. Let k, be integers such that k > 0, 0 k. Let m1, … , mk be positive integers such that of them are odd and k - of them are even. Let Nk = Σi=1k mi -2k + + 2 . The aim of the present note is to show that, for any positive integers m1, … , mk, in general, \[ T(m1) (A) … T(mk) (A) T(Nk +1) (A). \] It is known that if < k (that is, if at least one of mi is even) then, for each A, equation* evenabstr T(m1) (A) … T(mk) (A) ⊂eq T(Nk ) (A) equation* so our result cannot be improved if <k. Let Nk = Σi=1k mi -k+1. Recently Dangovski has proved that if m1, … , mk are any positive integers then, in general, \[ T(m1) (A) … T(mk) (A) T(Nk+1) (A) . \] Since Nk = Nk - (k - -1), Dangovski's result is stronger than ours if = k and is weaker than ours if k-2; if = k-1 then Nk = Nk (k-1) so both results coincide. It is known that if = k (that is, if all mi are odd) then, for each A, equation* alloddabstr T(m1) (A) … T(mk) (A) ⊂eq T(Nk) (A) equation* so in this case Dangovski's result cannot be improved.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.