Discrete least-squares approximations over optimized downward closed polynomial spaces in arbitrary dimension

Abstract

We analyze the accuracy of the discrete least-squares approximation of a function u in multivariate polynomial spaces PΛ:= span \y yν\,: \, ν∈ Λ\ with Λ⊂ N0d over the domain Γ:=[-1,1]d, based on the sampling of this function at points y1,…,ym ∈ Γ. The samples are independently drawn according to a given probability density ρ belonging to the class of multivariate beta densities, which includes the uniform and Chebyshev densities as particular cases. We restrict our attention to polynomial spaces associated with downward closed sets Λ of prescribed cardinality n, and we optimize the choice of the space for the given sample. This implies, in particular, that the selected polynomial space depends on the sample. We are interested in comparing the error of this least-squares approximation measured in L2(Γ,dρ) with the best achievable polynomial approximation error when using downward closed sets of cardinality n. We establish conditions between the dimension n and the size m of the sample, under which these two errors are proven to be comparable. Our main finding is that the dimension d enters only moderately in the resulting trade-off between m and n, in terms of a logarithmic factor (d), and is even absent when the optimization is restricted to a relevant subclass of downward closed sets, named anchored sets. In principle, this allows one to use these methods in arbitrarily high or even infinite dimension. Our analysis builds upon [2] which considered fixed and nonoptimized downward closed multi-index sets. Potential applications of the proposed results are found in the development and analysis of numerical methods for computing the solution to high-dimensional parametric or stochastic PDEs.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…