Particle-number projection in the finite-temperature mean-field approximation

Abstract

Calculation of statistical properties of nuclei in a finite-temperature mean-field theory requires projection onto good particle number, since the theory is formulated in the grand canonical ensemble. This projection is usually carried out in a saddle-point approximation. Here we derive formulas for an exact particle-number projection of the finite-temperature mean-field solution. We consider both deformed nuclei, in which the pairing condensate is weak and the Hartree-Fock (HF) approximation is the appropriate mean-field theory, and nuclei with strong pairing condensates, in which the appropriate theory is the Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov (HFB) approximation, a method that explicitly violates particle-number conservation. For the HFB approximation, we present a general projection formula for a condensate that is time-reversal invariant and a simpler formula for the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) limit, which is realized in nuclei with spherical condensates. We apply the method to three heavy nuclei: a typical deformed nucleus 162Dy, a typical spherical nucleus 148Sm, and a transitional nucleus 150Sm in which the pairing condensate is deformed. We compare the results of this projection with results from the saddle-point approximation and exact shell model Monte Carlo calculations. We find that the approximate canonical HF entropy in the particle-number projection decreases monotonically to zero in the limit when the temperature goes to zero. However, in a nucleus with a strong pairing condensate, the approximate canonical HFB entropy in the particle-number projection decreases monotonically to a negative value, reflecting the violation of particle-number conservation. Computationally, the exact particle-number projection is more efficient than calculating the derivatives required in the saddle-point approximation.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…