On cardinality bounds involving the weak Lindel\"of degree

Abstract

We give a general closing-off argument in Theorem 2.1 from which several corollaries follow, including (1) if X is a locally compact Hausdorff space then |X|≤ 2wL(X)(X), and (2) if X is a locally compact power homogeneous Hausdorff space then |X|≤ 2wL(X)t(X). The first extends the well-known cardinality bound 2(X) for a compactum X in a new direction. As |X|≤ 2wL(X)(X) for a normal space X [3], this enlarges the class of known Tychonoff spaces for which this bound holds. In 2.10 we give a short, direct proof of (1) that does not use 2.1. Yet 2.1 is broad enough to establish results much more general than (1), such as if X is a regular space with a π-base B such that |B|≤ 2wL(X)(X) for all B∈B, then |X|≤ 2wL(X)(X). Separately, it is shown that if X is a regular space with a π-base whose elements have compact closure, then |X|≤ 2wL(X)(X)t(X). This partially answers a question from [3] and gives a third, separate proof of (1). We also show that if X is a weakly Lindel\"of, normal, sequential space with (X)≤ 20, then |X|≤ 20. Result (2) above is a new generalization of the cardinality bound 2t(X) for a power homogeneous compactum X (Arhangel'skii, van Mill, and Ridderbos [2], De la Vega in the homogeneous case [9]). To this end we show that if U⊂eq clD⊂eq X, where X is power homogeneous and U is open, then |U|≤ |D|π(X). This is a strengthening of a result of Ridderbos [18].

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…