Phase Coexistence for the Hard-Core Model on Z2

Abstract

The hard-core model has attracted much attention across several disciplines, representing lattice gases in statistical physics and independent sets in discrete mathematics and computer science. On finite graphs, we are given a parameter λ, and an independent set I arises with probability proportional to λ|I|. On infinite graphs a Gibbs measure is defined as a suitable limit with the correct conditional probabilities, and we are interested in determining when this limit is unique and when there is phase coexistence, i.e., existence of multiple Gibbs measures. It has long been conjectured that on Z2 this model has a critical value λc ≈ 3.796 with the property that if λ < λc then it exhibits uniqueness of phase, while if λ > λc then there is phase coexistence. Much of the work to date on this problem has focused on the regime of uniqueness, with the state of the art being recent work of Sinclair, Srivastava, Stefankovic and Yin showing that there is a unique Gibbs measure for all λ < 2.538. Here we give the first non-trivial result in the other direction, showing that there are multiple Gibbs measures for all λ > 5.3506. There is some potential for lowering this bound, but with the methods we are using we cannot hope to replace 5.3506 with anything below about 4.8771. Our proof begins along the lines of the standard Peierls argument, but we add two innovations. First, following ideas of Koteck\'y and Randall, we construct an event that distinguishes two boundary conditions and always has long contours associated with it, obviating the need to accurately enumerate short contours. Second, we obtain improved bounds on the number of contours by relating them to a new class of self-avoiding walks on an oriented version of Z2.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…