The size-frequency distribution of H>13 NEOs and ARM targets detected by Pan-STARRS1

Abstract

We determine the absolute magnitude (H) distribution (or size-frequency distribution, SFD; N(H) 10α H where α is the slope of the distribution) for near-Earth objects (NEO) with 13<H<30 and Asteroid Retrieval Mission (ARM) targets with 27<H<31 that were detected by the 1\ telescope of the Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System - Pan-STARRS1 (e.g. Kaiser et al. 2002, Kaiser 2004, Hodapp et al. 2004). The NEO and ARM target detection efficiencies were calculated using the Greenstreet et al. (2012) NEO orbit distribution. The debiased Pan-STARRS1 NEO absolute magnitude distribution is more complex than a single slope power law - it shows two transitions - at H16 from steep to shallow slope, and in the 21<H<23 interval from a shallow to steep slope, which is consistent with other recent works (e.g. Mainzer et al. 2011c, Brown et al. 2013, Harris and D`Abramo 2015). We fit α = 0.480.02 for NEOs with 13<H<16, α = 0.330.01 for NEOs with 16<H<22, and α = 0.620.03 for the smaller objects with H>22. There is also another change in slope from steep to shallow around H=27. The three ARM target candidates detected by Pan-STARRS1 in one year of surveying have a corrected SFD with slope α = 0.40+0.33-0.45. We also show that the window for follow up observations of small (H22) NEOs with the NASA IRTF telescope and Arecibo and Goldstone radars are extremely short - on order of days, and procedures for fast response must be implemented in order to measure physical characteristics of small Earth-approaching objects. CFHT's MegaCam and Pan-STARRS1 have longer observing windows and are capable of following-up more NEOs due to their deeper limiting magnitudes and wider fields of view.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…