Rate of convergence of major cost incurred in the in-situ permutation algorithm
Abstract
The in-situ permutation algorithm due to MacLeod replaces (x1,·s,xn) by (xp(1),·s,xp(n)) where π=(p(1),·s,p(n)) is a permutation of \1,2,·s,n\ using at most O(1) space. Kirshenhofer, Prodinger and Tichy have shown that the major cost incurred in the algorithm satisfies a recurrence similar to sequence of the number of key comparisons needed by the Quicksort algorithm to sort an array of n randomly permuted items. Further, Hwang has proved that the normalized cost converges in distribution. Here, following Neininger and R\"uschendorf, we prove the that rate of convergence to be of the order ((n)/n) in the Zolotarev metric.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.