Immersions of the circle into a surface

Abstract

We classify immersions f of S1 in a 2-manifold M in terms of elementary invariants: the parity S(f) of the number of double points of a self-transverse C1-approximation of f, and the turning number T(e f) of the immersion e f:S1 Mf⊂ R2, where f is a lift of f to the cover Mf of M corresponding to the subgroup <[f]>⊂π1(M). Namely, immersions f,g:S1 M are regular homotopic if and only if they are homotopic, and if M=S2 or R P2 or the normal bundle (f) is non-orientable, then S(f)=S(g), whereas if M= S2, R P2 and (f), (g) have orientations o, o', compatible with respect to the homotopy, then T(eo f)=T(eo' g), where eo is a standard embedding of the oriented surface Mf (an annulus or a plane) in R2. In fact, for homotopic immersions f, g both S(f)-S(g) and T(eo f)-T(eo' g) boil down to the turning number of a lift of a null-homotopic immersion f\# g* to the universal cover of M. Here "immersions" S1 M are either smooth or topological; we include a smoothing theorem, which shows that there is no difference. We also classify immersions of a graph in M up to regular homotopy in terms of the invariants S(f) and T(eo f) of immersed S1's. The proofs are based on the h-principle. The point of this unsophisticated note is to simplify [10] and [11], where a classification of immersions of a graph in M was obtained for M R P2 in terms of a rather laboriously defined "winding number" of a pair of homotopic immersions S1 M (rather than of an individual immersion) with respect to a given vector field with zeroes on M.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…