Transcendency Degree One Function Fields Over a Finite Field with Many Automorphisms

Abstract

Let K be the algebraic closure of a finite field Fq of odd characteristic p. For a positive integer m prime to p, let F=K(x,y) be the transcendency degree 1 function field defined by yq+y=xm+x-m. Let t=xm(q-1) and H=K(t). The extension F|H is a non-Galois extension. Let K be the Galois closure of F with respect to H. By a result of Stichtenoth, K has genus g(K)=(qm-1)(q-1), p-rank (Hasse-Witt invariant) γ(K)=(q-1)2 and a K-automorphism group of order at least 2q2m(q-1). In this paper we prove that this subgroup is the full K-automorphism group of K; more precisely Aut K(K)=Q D where Q is an elementary abelian p-group of order q2 and D has a index 2 cyclic subgroup of order m(q-1). In particular, m|AutK(K)|> g(K)3/2, and if K is ordinary (i.e. g(K)=γ(K)) then |AutK(K)|>g3/2. On the other hand, if G is a solvable subgroup of the K-automorphism group of an ordinary, transcendency degree 1 function field L of genus g(L)≥ 2 defined over K, then by a result due to Korchm\'aros and Montanucci, |AutK(K)| 34 (g(L)+1)3/2<682g(L)3/2. This shows that K hits this bound up to the constant 682. Since AutK(K) has several subgroups, the fixed subfield FN of such a subgroup N may happen to have many automorphisms provided that the normalizer of N in AutK(K) is large enough. This possibility is worked out for subgroups of Q.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…