On a biased edge isoperimetric inequality for the discrete cube
Abstract
The `full' edge isoperimetric inequality for the discrete cube (due to Harper, Bernstein, Lindsay and Hart) specifies the minimum size of the edge boundary ∂ A of a set A ⊂ \0,1\n, as a function of |A|. A weaker (but more widely-used) lower bound is |∂ A| ≥ |A| 2(2n/|A|), where equality holds iff A is a subcube. In 2011, the first author obtained a sharp `stability' version of the latter result, proving that if |∂ A| ≤ |A| ((2n/|A|)+ε), then there exists a subcube C such that |A C|/|A| = O(ε /(1/ε)). The `weak' version of the edge isoperimetric inequality has the following well-known generalization for the `p-biased' measure μp on the discrete cube: if p ≤ 1/2, or if 0 < p < 1 and A is monotone increasing, then pμp(∂ A) ≥ μp(A) p(μp(A)). In this paper, we prove a sharp stability version of the latter result, which generalizes the aforementioned result of the first author. Namely, we prove that if pμp(∂ A) ≤ μp(A) (p(μp(A))+ε), then there exists a subcube C such that μp(A C)/μp(A) = O(ε' /(1/ε')), where ε' =ε (1/p). This result is a central component in recent work of the authors proving sharp stability versions of a number of Erdos-Ko-Rado type theorems in extremal combinatorics, including the seminal `complete intersection theorem' of Ahlswede and Khachatrian. In addition, we prove a biased-measure analogue of the `full' edge isoperimetric inequality, for monotone increasing sets, and we observe that such an analogue does not hold for arbitrary sets, hence answering a question of Kalai. We use this result to give a new proof of the `full' edge isoperimetric inequality, one relying on the Kruskal-Katona theorem.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.