Beyond-mean-field study of the hyperon impurity effect in hypernuclei with shape coexistence

Abstract

[Background] The hyperon impurity effect in nuclei has been extensively studied in different mean-field models. Recently, there is a controversy about whether the hyperon is more tightly bound in the normal deformed (ND) states than that in the superdeformed (SD) states.[Purpose] This article is aimed to provide a beyond-mean-field study of the low-lying states of hypernuclei with shape coexistence and to shed some light on the controversy.[Method] The models of relativistic mean-field and beyond based on a relativistic point-coupling energy functional are adopted to study the low-lying states of both 37 and 36Ar. The wavefunctions of low-lying states are constructed as a superposition of a set of relativistic mean-field states with different values of quadrupole deformation parameter. The projections onto both particle number and angular momentum are considered.[Results] The binding energies in both ND and SD states of 37Ar are studied in the case of the hyperon occupying s, p, or d state in the spherical limit, respectively. For comparison, four sets of nucleon-hyperon point-coupling interactions are used respectively. Moreover, the spectra of low-lying states in 36Ar and 37_sAr are calculated based on the same nuclear energy density functional. The results indicate that the SD states exist in 37Ar for all the four effective interactions. Furthermore, the s reduces the quadrupole collectivity of ND states to a greater extent than that of SD states. For 37Ar, the beyond-mean-field decreases the s binding energy of the SD state by 0.17 MeV, but it almost has no effect on that of the ND state. [Conclusions] In 37_sAr, the p and d binding energies of the SD states ...

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…