Fermi arc, pseudogap and strange-metal phase in hole-dopd lanthanum cuprates

Abstract

Hole doping of La2-xAexCuO4 (Ae=Sr,Ba) and La2-y-xLnySrxCuO4 (Ln = Nd, Eu; y = 0.4, 0.2) introduces unidirectional charge density waves (CDWs) of incommensurability deltac(x) in domains of the CuO2 planes. A periodic structure, each CDW gives rise to a Bragg-reflection mirror of extension deltac(x) that attaches to a nodal point \.Q on the planar diagonal in reciprocal space. This confines itinerant holes to a Fermi arc about \.Q, leaving a pseudogap along the remainder of the underlying Fermi surface. The length of the Fermi arc and the magnitude of the pseudogap both are determined by δc(x). The pseudogap closes when the Fermi arc reaches the antinodal symmetry points M. This is the case at a doping level x*0 = 0.182 for La2-xAexCuO4 at T=0 (quantum critical point, QCP) and otherwise at a doping-dependent pseudogap temperature T*(x) that marks the boundary between the compounds' pseudogap phase and strange-metal phase. The different value of the observed QCP in La2-y-xLnySrxCuO4, x*0 = 0.235, is attributed to extra magnetic order from Ln3+ ions with a finite magnetic moment instead of La3+ with none. The possibility of quantum oscillations in La2-y-xLnySrxCuO4 in the high-end doping interval of their pseudogap phase, 0.182 < x < 0.235, is raised. The strange-metal phase is interpreted as a consequence of conflicting Bragg reflection conditions for the crystals' itinerant charge carriers when boundaries of the BZ and the CDW mirrors coincide, frustrating umklapp processes of carrier-carrier scattering.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…