Induced Ramsey-type results and binary predicates for point sets

Abstract

Let k and p be positive integers and let Q be a finite point set in general position in the plane. We say that Q is (k,p)-Ramsey if there is a finite point set P such that for every k-coloring c of Pp there is a subset Q' of P such that Q' and Q have the same order type and Q'p is monochromatic in c. Nesetril and Valtr proved that for every k ∈ N, all point sets are (k,1)-Ramsey. They also proved that for every k 2 and p 2, there are point sets that are not (k,p)-Ramsey. As our main result, we introduce a new family of (k,2)-Ramsey point sets, extending a result of Nesetril and Valtr. We then use this new result to show that for every k there is a point set P such that no function that maps ordered pairs of distinct points from P to a set of size k can satisfy the following "local consistency" property: if attains the same values on two ordered triples of points from P, then these triples have the same orientation. Intuitively, this implies that there cannot be such a function that is defined locally and determines the orientation of point triples.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…