Violation of causality in f(T) gravity

Abstract

[Abridged] In its standard formulation, the f(T) field equations are not invariant under local Lorentz transformations, and thus the theory does not inherit the causal structure of special relativity. A locally Lorentz covariant f(T) gravity theory has been devised recently, and this local causality problem has been overcome. The nonlocal question, however, is left open. If gravitation is to be described by this covariant f(T) gravity theory there are a number of issues that ought to be examined in its context, including the question as to whether its field equations allow homogeneous G\"odel-type solutions, which necessarily leads to violation of causality on nonlocal scale. Here, to look into the potentialities and difficulties of the covariant f(T) theories, we examine whether they admit G\"odel-type solutions. We take a combination of a perfect fluid with electromagnetic plus a scalar field as source, and determine a general G\"odel-type solution, which contains special solutions in which the essential parameter of G\"odel-type geometries, m2, defines any class of homogeneous G\"odel-type geometries. We extended to the context of covariant f(T) gravity a theorem, which ensures that any perfect-fluid homogeneous G\"odel-type solution defines the same set of G\"odel tetrads hA~μ up to a Lorentz transformation. We also shown that the single massless scalar field generates G\"odel-type solution with no closed timelike curves. Even though the covariant f(T) gravity restores Lorentz covariance of the field equations and the local validity of the causality principle, the bare existence of the G\"odel-type solutions makes apparent that the covariant formulation of f(T) gravity does not preclude non-local violation of causality in the form of closed timelike curves.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…